A landmark US climate trial examining whether the state of Montana is violating the rights of young people to a healthy environment ended early on Tuesday. The trial, known as Held v. Montana, was brought by a group of 16 youths aged between five and 22, who argue that they have been harmed by the impacts of fossil fuels and climate change. The case could have significant implications for policy in Montana, which holds one of the largest coal reserves in the country, and may also influence similar lawsuits in other states. During the trial, plaintiffs testified about the individual ways they have been affected by climate change, and were supported by scientific experts who highlighted the harm caused by fossil fuel consumption. The trial ended earlier than expected after the state rushed through its arguments, leading experts to suggest that the state had failed to take the case seriously. Judge Kathy Seeley is expected to take months to deliberate on the case.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24741580/1258643945.jpg "Could the groundbreaking climate trial be the solution we need?")
Could the groundbreaking climate trial be the solution we need?
Denial of responsibility! Swift Telecast is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – swifttelecast.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.