Antioch is enhancing its tenant protections with new regulations to prevent landlord retaliation and harassment.
The City Council voted 3-1 to implement these rules after a three-hour session of public comments and debate. Councilwoman Lori Ogorchock dissented, and Councilman Mike Barbanica, a real estate agent/broker, recused himself.
Ethan Silverstein, an attorney with the tenant advocate group ACCE Institute, explained to the council that these types of protections are becoming more popular in other cities, including Sacramento.
Under the anti-retaliation policy, landlords will no longer be allowed to retaliate against tenants for exercising certain legal rights. This includes situations where landlords increase rent as a response to a tenant’s request for necessary repairs.
The proposed anti-harassment rule expands on the existing state law by addressing harmful actions done by landlords in “bad faith” or to avoid expenses or inconveniences. It covers situations where landlords refuse to provide what tenants need or want.
Silverstein commended the proposed protections and highlighted the fines that will be imposed on landlords who violate the rules. He also appreciated the unique elements of the ordinance that address specific issues in Antioch.
The California Apartment Association, represented by opponent Rhovy Lyn Antonio, expressed concerns about the proposal, arguing that state laws already cover the issues raised. Antonio criticized the language on “retaliation” and disagreed with the proposed fines.
Several local landlords and real estate agents supported these concerns, warning that the new regulations could lead to a decrease in rental properties and increased costs for residents. They urged the council to consider the impact on housing providers and strive for a balanced approach.
On the other hand, local tenants and advocates spoke in favor of the measure, emphasizing the need for protections. Millie Phillips of the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy called for local governments to enforce laws against harassment and retaliation when the state fails to do so.
After considering all perspectives, the City Council approved the new tenant protections with some minor language revisions and an exemption for residential senior care facilities.