Northwestern University has implemented extensive anti-hazing policies and prevention tools, including an online hazing education course for all incoming undergraduates. However, despite these measures, a recent investigation of hazing within the university’s football program revealed a toxic team culture that had persisted for years. In response, a group of professors has called for greater transparency and accountability from the university and its athletic department, as well as support for students who have experienced hazing or trauma.
Experts acknowledge that policies and training alone are often insufficient to break the cycle of hazing, as these rituals are deeply ingrained in the culture of teams and organizations. Victims may be afraid to come forward due to fears of ostracism, disbelief, or retaliation. Additionally, some individuals who have been hazed may not even recognize or acknowledge that they were subjected to hazing.
The definition of hazing can vary, and individuals may use euphemisms or code words to minimize or normalize the behavior. In the Northwestern football case, for example, some players referred to a practice as “running,” but it involved older players restraining and engaging in sexualized acts with younger players as a punishment.
Hazing often becomes a cycle, with perpetrators who were once victims themselves. Coaches play a crucial role in either changing or worsening the culture surrounding hazing. While Northwestern’s head football coach was fired due to his failure to prevent hazing, experts argue that addressing the issue requires more than just personnel changes. It requires a cultural shift within the athletic department.
Preventing hazing is a complex problem that goes beyond implementing policies. Experts advocate for a focus on positive approaches, such as creating a sense of belonging and promoting teamwork, to help eliminate hazing behaviors.